Gingival microleakage in class II composite restorations using different flowable composites as liner: an in vitro evaluation

Authors

  • Ali Bijani ,Non-Communicable Pediatrics Diseases Research Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol-Iran.
  • Behnaz Esmaeili ,Dental Materials Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol-Iran.
  • Ghazaleh Ahmadizenouz ,Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol-Iran.
  • Hadi Khadem ,Faculty of Dentistry, Babol university of Medical Sciences, Babol-Iran.
  • Neda Lotfi ,Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol-Iran.
Abstract:

Introduction: One of the main disadvantages of composites is marginal microleakage using flowable composites as a liner beneath composite restorations has been recommended to reduce microleakage. The aim of this study was to assess the microleakage of class II restorations with different flowable composites liners. Materials & Methods :45 extracted premolars teeth with class II cavity preparation (90 cavities) were divided into five groups and filled as follows: 1.control group: hybrid composite(Z250) 2. Z250+surefil SDR flow 3.Z250+filtek supreme xt flow composite 4.Z250+Grandio flow 5.Z250+Tetric flow. Mesial and distal cavities were filled using snowplow and layering technique, respectively. After that, the samples were immersed in 0. 5% fuchsin solution and sectioned. Gingival microleakage was then graded. Data were analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U test. Results: There was no significant difference between the snowplow and layering methods. Microleakage of Tetric flow and Grandio flow liners was significantly higher than the control group. Other flowable composites showed no significant difference in comparison with the control group. Conclusion: In the present study, the results indicated that the flowable composites were not effective on reducing gingival microleakage.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Evaluation of Gingival Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations with Different Lining Techniques: An In Vitro Study

Aim. To compare the microleakage in class II composite restorations without a liner/with resin modified glass ionomer and flowable composite liner. Method. Forty standardized MO cavities were prepared on human permanent mandibular molars extracted for periodontal reasons and then divided into 4 groups of ten specimens. The cavity preparations were etched, rinsed, blot dried, and light cured and...

full text

In-Vitro Evaluation of Microleakage of Class II Cavities Restored with Bulk-Fill Flowable Composite

Background and Aim: Composite placement poses many challenges, especially in the gingival floor with dentinal margins. Microleakage is one of the factors affecting the longevity of dental restorations. We aimed to compare the microleakage of cavities filled with bulk-fill composite at enamel and dentinal margins. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, a total of 102 sound human pre...

full text

In vitro evaluation of microleakage of a flowable composite in Class V restorations.

The aim of this study was to evaluate microleakage around class V restorations using a flowable composite compared to a hybrid composite. Forty class V cavities were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces of 20 human teeth, with occlusal and cervical margins at the enamel and cementum/dentin levels, respectively. Specimens were divided into 2 groups with 10 samples each. Group 1: buccal caviti...

full text

Microleakage of Flowable Composite Restorations

Author’s response I totally agree with comments by Pitak-Arnnop et al which emphasizes the importance of clinical relevance (though not statistically significant) and 95% CI confidence interval in today's publication process this change of mindset had evolved over many years of education on research & biostatistics. I must clarify that the present article is highlighting the well-known bias of ...

full text

Effect of different gingival margin restorations of class II cavities on microleakage: an in-vitro study

INTRODUCTION Microleakage is one of the important contributing factors in the failure of resin restorations. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the location of the gingival margin (enamel, dentin, or cementum) on nanohybrid composite resin on the microleakage of Class II posterior restoration. METHODS This was an in vitro study done at Al-Farabi College of Dentistry and Nurs...

full text

The Effect of Fluid Composite as Gingival Layer on Microleakage of Class II Composite Restorations

Introduction: Fluid composites have been suggested as gingival layer beneath class II composite restorations to improve marginal integrity and reduce microleakage. This in-vitro study evaluated the influence of fluid composites as gingival layer on microleakage of class II packable, microhybrid, and fiber-reinforced composite restorations with the margins below the cementoenamel junc-

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 4  issue None

pages  10- 16

publication date 2015-03

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Keywords

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023